Capital Punishment and Deterrence of Crime

Published: 2021-07-06 06:35:50
essay essay

Category: Criminology

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

GET MY ESSAY
Abstract This document focuses on the vital role played by capital punishment in the deterrence of crime. The issue of capital punishment has been at the heart of the debate on the measures to reduce the growing rate of crime. Some people argue against the death penalty on moral grounds. However, a majority of the criminals that are merely incarcerated show no signs of deterrence one they get out of the prisons. Hence, capital punishment is the only effective way that the rate of crime can be lowered by instilling fear among the criminals.Capital Punishment and Deterrence of CrimeIntroduction Capital punishment plays an important role in the deterrence of crime within the society. However, despite its effectiveness throughout the history of the world, the issue of the death penalty has been at the heart of the political and public debate in recent times. The opponents of capital punishment regard it as an inhumane treatment and an infringement of the rights of people. But, contrary to popular belief, the truth is the opposite. While capital punishment is not exactly cost effective, it is successful in the deterrence of crime. Capital punishment is also necessary to help the public feel safe and to feel that justice was righteously served.ArgumentsThe death penalty has always been utilized throughout the world to punish the criminals involved in heinous crimes. Yes, it can be argued that it is a very severe form of punishment, but at the same time, it should also be kept in mind that the hardened criminals who are punished this way, do not deserve even an ounce of kindness. Capital punishment is usually reserved for the people convicted of the most serious crimes, such as murder. Therefore, the foremost argument in favor of capital punishment can be the fact that such criminals disregarded the sanctity of the human life in the first place and therefore, they do not deserve to be spared. The punishment they get should be befitting to the severity of the crime they committed.Furthermore, a sense of justice requires that the offender, who has deprived another person of her or his life, should be punished for this. Since the institution of the death penalty historically arose from the ancient principle of blood feud, “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth,” only by destroying a villain, the victim’s relatives would consider the incident exhausted.Secondly, the death penalty is an effective enough method to prevent serious crimes. Therefore, intentional murders should be punished by depriving the offender of life in order to deter other potential criminals from such acts. At the same time, according to scientific research, the use of capital punishment has a high preventive indicator, the fear of a criminal before death sometimes causes her or him to deter form wrongful actsThe followers of this argument believe that even if the death penalty does not stop other criminals, it will still benefit society, in the form of one less brutal killer. The death penalty is undoubtedly a deterrent mechanism against the growth of serious crimes. And from this point of view, it can be regarded as an instrument for the protection of the society.On the same note, as shown by numerous scientific studies on this issue, if capital punishment is abolished, the criminal, committing a serious act, expects that she or he will be able to avoid the highest punitive measure and therefore at the time of committing a crime she or he does not think that she or he will be condemned to death. Upon getting caught, these criminals hire the best available law experts to save them from life imprisonment, as the death penalty is already absent.It is true that capital punishment may be costlier than other methods of punishment, but this fact merely cannot be utilized to argue against the effectiveness of the measure. As humans, it is the right of the affected families to seek retribution against the person responsible for causing them harm. One has to consider the case that if the sole bread earner of the family is murdered then how it can be expected for the family of the murdered person to forgive the individual responsible for the crime. They will seek every possible way to make the murderer pay dearly and the worst form of punishment in this regard is only the death penalty.Moreover, according to statistical researchers, at the present, there are more than 2800 people in the prisons that are on death row. Furthermore, an estimated 250 people are added every year to death row. Although some people might state that there may be some innocent people among these prisoners, but it is not a strong enough argument to abolish the death penalty. In this context, it is worthy to note that the process of determining the guilt of an individual before assigning her or him to the death row is not a simple one. In fact, the trial of these people takes a long time. In some cases, the trial may go on for years until the accused is finally convicted. Throughout the process of the trial extensive evidence is presented before the jury and the judge. Only after careful examination of the evidence a person is deemed appropriate to deserve capital punishment. Also, contrary to popular belief that the death penalty is losing the support of the American public, more than 70 percent of the American population support capital punishment in one form or the other.Still, it is highly imperative to consider the fact that although a majority of the American public is in favor of capital punishment, there are certain people who strongly oppose it. One of the main reasons behind this thinking is that they consider the process of administering the capital punishment as inadequate. Such a concern has its roots in the notion that the process of application of death penalty is not fair and certain factors play a significant role in assigning death penalty to an individual. These factors may be related to the aspects of race, gender, the social or the financial status and other aspects. Yet, despite these concerns, there is no concrete evidence that death penalty is mostly reserved for the people of lower status or belonging to races that are considered to be inferior.Researchers have also insinuated that many people do not support the capital punishment; instead, they are merely accepting the idea. They are noting that there is a difference between accepting something and supporting something. They also realized that 9 percent of the people that are in favor of capital punishment changed their response when presented with alternatives to capital punishment. Additionally, it was implicated that women are more likely to reject the idea of capital punishment than are men.In the modern United States, the issue of the application or abolition of the death penalty is one of the most discussed issues. Its significance is largely due to the fact that the evaluation of this type of punishment also gives the public consciousness. And now, especially after the rise in terrorism in the U.S., voices in favor of the institution of the death penalty for terrorists are heard more often. In general, this supreme measure of punishment is present in the legislation of 68 countries, including Japan, India, China and Saudi Arabia.In addition, one may argue that capital punishment eliminates the opportunity for rehabilitation. It is indeed the case. However, it should be noted that the perpetrators of heinous crimes do not deserve any opportunity at rehabilitation. Taking a human’s life is not a matter to be taken lightly. Human life is the most sacred thing on earth and the one responsible for taking it must pay dearly. Therefore, the presence of capital punishment acts as a warning for other people to never engage in such crimes as it would result in the end of their own lives. Hence, people deter from committing such kind of crimes. ConclusionIn conclusion, after examining the arguments stated above, it can efficiently be said that capital punishment plays an imperative role in the deterrence of crime. It instills the feeling of fear among the people desiring to commit heinous crimes by viewing the example of other such criminals losing their lives as punishment for their crimes. Also, a vast majority of the American people support capital punishment due to its effectiveness in the prevention of serious crimes.

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!

GET UNIQUE ESSAY

We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read