‘LA Louisanne Restaurant Sued for Pregnancy Discrimination’

Published: 2021-07-06 23:10:39
essay essay

Category: English

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

GET MY ESSAY
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) works to ensure that employee rights are respected and protected. In the above case the EEOC sued LA based Louisanne restaurant for unlawful termination of a worker based on her pregnancy. According to EEOC (2017), the restaurant violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which was amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. The pregnant worker got her server’s time cut down after she was pregnant and subsequently she was denied to resume working for the company after giving birth. Thus, the EOCC sued the restaurant for back pay, compensation and damages for the employee and others that have faced a similar case. The case is filled in the US District Court California (EEOC v. LA Louisane Incorporation., Case NO. 2:17-cv-06690). Further the organization sort an injunction to prevent future cases of discrimination by LA Louisanne Incorporation. The case presents a case that involves discrimination of a person based on their personal situation.The suit by EEOC against pregnancy discrimination is significant since there are many cases of the same nature. According to Strauss (2018), despite the existence of protective regulations, the issue of pregnancy discrimination persists. Hence, the case against the restaurant is significant in portraying the actual situation. Women should not be discriminated based on their pregnancy; moreover, female workers should not be force to choose between having children and their jobs. The impications of EEOC v. LA Louisane Incorporation are yet to known; however, it is evident that a violation of personal rights and laws has occurred. The financial compensation and fine applied for by EOCC seeks to discourage other companies from discriminating their employees due to pregnancy. The fines is imposed on the company would be a loss for the restaurant. On the other hand, the implications of the injunction are to prevent future instances of unlawful termination of employment. In spite of the existing laws, there is need for addressing such cases of discrimination since regulation seem not enough to protect employees.ReferencesEEOC (2017). EEOC Sues LA Louisanne Restaurant for Pregnancy Discrimination. Eeoc.gov. Retrieved 22 February 2018, from https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/9-12-17.cfmStrauss, E. C. (2018). Fired for being pregnant . CNN. Retrieved 23 February 2018, from https://edition.cnn.com/2018/02/01/health/fired-pregnant-parenting-strauss/index.html

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!

GET UNIQUE ESSAY

We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read