Similar to other nations, Canada’s politicians, academics as well as members of the private sector have been in serious evaluation of the core functions of the government within the society and how it can be improved. Similar efforts have been present in the past and various circumstance have come together to provide greater urgency to the exercise. Factors such as debts, deficits, changing international environment, new technologies and high expectations have been in the forefront to push the redefinition of the government making sure it plays its role.However, this has not been an easy process as principal challenges have raised as people aim at making the government more effective and efficient. This has resulted to the elimination of government programs, the reduction of the number of public bureaucracies and the changing of management processes all in the name of providing services to citizens. Among the numerous sectors the Canada government has tried to alter, the public service is one of them. The main objective of this paper is to offer a concise discussion of the reforms Canada has experienced over the years as it tries to better the public service.Since the 19th century Canada has witnessed attempts to try and alter the management process as well as structure of the federal public service. Some of the reforms encountered after the Second World War are still being experienced today. Two post-war exercises that have had a great impact on Canadian’s public service are the Lambert Commission and Glasco Commission. These two exercises dealt with same issues and helped advance a series of important proposals. Currently, the Canadian government has tried to find ways that offer services to citizens outside the previous bureaucratic structures. The privatization of state services has helped offer positive reform. Another solution that the Canadian government that adopted is the usage of quasi-public and quasi-private entities which are also identified as SOAs (Special Operating Agencies). SOAs has been seen to embody both characteristics and drawbacks of the federal reform.Administrative reforms since 1962Constitutional change has not been the only major reform that was seen to emerge in Canada during the post-war period. For the last three decades, the focus government reform in Canada has always been a continuing search that aims at improving efficiencies as well as reducing costs within the administration of public affairs at the state level. This means creating an administrative government that is answerable for all its actions as it continues to remain flexible and inventive enough to deal with any challenges thrown to it by the pluralistic society. The private sector in Canada has always been developed and efficient in offering its services for quite some time. Thus, if the public service could be the same as the private service, then these challenges would be less daunting. Too many reform attempts have been initiated and erred with the belief that simple analogies can be achieved between public and private sectors. However, when it comes to the administrative component, the Canadian government works in a complex and nuanced environment and thus the creation of conflicting demands making it hard to achieve the set reforms. The search for attaining and obtaining administrative reforms has taken many shapes including the royal commissions as well as investigations to the public service. It has helped produce a number of alterations to the structure of the public service as well as its procedures. Some of the major administrative reform attempts that have been experienced by the Canadian government since the post-war period include;The Glassco CommissionThis was the first large-scale attempt that aimed at bringing about reforms and was initiated by Diefenbaker’s government back in 60’s era. The attempt took form of the Royal Commission on Government Organization and was chaired by Grant Glassco, thus the name Glassco Commission. The Commission main aim was to study and offer conclusions as well as recommendations regarding Canadian public administration. The government decided to launch the Royal Commission after a variety of concerns were raised regarding the Public service sector. One of these concerns was the Cabinet’s worry that the public service sector was losing control over government expenditure and bureaucratic apparatus. It was decided that a more rational type of organization is to be established on an administrative structure during the post-war and after and thus the inspiration to develop a Royal Commission. The commissioners were required to make inquiries as well as report the approaches employed on by the Canada governmental agencies and departments. Moreover, they were to offer recommendations of which approach would be the best in promoting efficiency while improving public service in public enterprises.The Royal Commission was directed to seek alternatives that will help eliminate overlap and duplication of services thus promoting efficiency through decentralization and improving budgeting procedures. The principle that governed the commissioners was that the government administration must be made in a way that fits the needs and wants of the Canadian citizens and the public servants ought to have the widest possible opportunities as this will help develop varied capabilities for serving the Canadian public with mature judgment. After thorough study of the government public service, , it was concluded that Canada’s Public Service was not suffiecntly adaptable to the emerging challenges brought about by the post-war era. The parties who were at fault according to the commissioners were central agencies that enacted regulations that restricted managers from doing their jobs effectively. Moreover, central agencies such as the treasury board Secretariat had denied ministers much of their authority thus corroding personal accountability of these officials.The commissioners instructed the remedy to this problem is letting manager do their work in peace in a given general framework of accountability formulated by new management center such as the Treasury Board. In an environment where rigid controls are not initiated, performance evaluation would be implemented to ensure accountability among the managers. It was assumed that these changes would help produce greater efficiencies in the program while restoring accountability and saving taxes. However, despite the implementation of these recommendations, a complete public service reform was not achieved. One of the reason why it was not achieved was because the commissioners had neglected indicating how the managers would be held accountability to the state as they are left to do their work.Lambert CommissionTwenty years after the Glassco Commission report, another commission was formulated as the intended problem had not yet been resolved which is reforming the public service. Government expenditure was still rising and accountability was deteriorating than before. Under the Trudeau government, a Lambert commission was developed. The commission was given two goals which included finding alternative to ascertain financial management and control was being practiced in all levels of public service. Its second objective was to formulate a successful administrative accountability of ministers to government where appropriate. In 1979, the commission released its findings after a careful evaluation of the matter at hand. Its findings were not different from its predecessors as it concluded no breakdown had occurred in the accountability of government officials.The commission argued that the management of government over the years had become fragmented as there existed haphazard budgeting and there was no accountability within government agencies. According to the commission, the creation of a fiscal plan would help in addressing loss of financial control and help in breaking down accountability. With the presence of such a plan, it will be easy for the government to allocate resources according to priorities and within the set budget. However, the proposal received a lot of critics as it was argued this proposal was unworkable as it was focused on the notion that policy and administration could be separated. The commissioners had not taken into consideration the decision-making processes with the government structure thus the proposal was bound to fail.Contemporary government reformsThere is no doubt that government reorganization has gradually become an international agenda on a growing scale. Sharing of information using improved technology as well as interpersonal contacts between administers in the public sector has resulted in the creation of uniformity among government officials. The Canadian government has been in the forefront to promoting reforms within its public sector making sure the services offered to the general population is as up to standard. Though these reforms might bear similar resemblance to previous efforts, current shots to reinvent the government are varying in various ways compared to the predecessors. Reform efforts in the contemporary government have been accustomed by significant changes such as declining availability of resources that will assist in fulfilling government resolutions. Compared to the past, governments can now operate despite revenue scarcity and massive deficits. This shows that the way government officials conduct their affairs now is more imperative.Many people tend to assume that the only the Canadian government can be able to manage the decline In revenue is by cutting back on services being offered but government officials are still under pressure to do more. Introduction and production of new technology as well as changing trading patterns has left government officials with more task of assisting citizens adjust to the changing environments. Moreover, the private sector wants the government to assist them meet the new challenges. These together with other factors have helped teach government sectors that a simple limitation on a service or size of government can bring about more problems than offer solutions. The disintegration of the global trade barriers has resulted in an increase in economic competition among countries and this has resulted on both the public and private sector seeking administrative apparatus of government in various sectors. Economies are nor restructuring, a process the Canadian government has embraced as a primary contributor to the GNP. As a result, the public sector has recognized the government as a vital instrument of structural reforms. For many countries, including Canada, an effective element that enable nation compete in an increasingly controversial international trading environment is public service. When nations compete with each other, their public services are also competing and a nation with an effective public service has a strong GNP. With this in mind, the government has tried to improve its public service making the public regard it as a force of society. The private sector has also come to perceive government as a constructive partner and is willing to work hand in hand.According to analysts, the new management philosophy that the Canadian government has incorporated that focuses on performance, result and the general impact is not enough. This is because it needs a change in the attitude as well as behavior of public service if it aims at succeeding. For others, morale problems have been the biggest hindrance for the Canadian people to receive efficient services. Thus the recent alternative for bringing about administrative changes focuses on restoring morale within the public service as well as institutionalizing new management philosophy. One way morale can be restored is by inculcating new entrepreneurial spirit among officials and importing positive values from the private sector. What makes recent attempts practical is the fact that they aim at changing the culture of public service through restoration or morale.In summation, it is clear that the Canada has undergone a lot of transformation with regards to public service since the 60s. The nation has tried to initiate programs and initiatives that will help reform and robust the public service sector with no avail. Despite the Glassco commission and the Lambert commission not fully able to produce positive results, its true to say that they did help in brining the issue to the table. If these initiatives had not been created and failed, then the Canadian public service would not have undergone the tremendous change it has. Though not perfect, the reforms undertaken have enabled Canada compete with other nations with ease knowing their people are receiving better services. Thus, the public regards the government as a force of society and look up to them for inspiration and motivation.