A state plays an important role in the development of any country. Not only the state but also the civil as well as private societies play very crucial roles and duties in development of a state. The main aim of this paper is to examine the role of the government in fostering development through the theoretical debates as well as the historical experience.The divide nation imagery was critically highlighted showing the extent inequality levels during the post-apartheid in South Africa. Mbeki’s two nation portrayal provides a current South Africa’s analysis. Not only racial income was evident but also the wage discrimination in the country. After 1994 democratization, the statutory racial last vestiges discriminations were ended. The available data states that a Gina coefficient was stable in the 1990s as interracial decreases, however, the intra-racial increases sharply (Baskin).Liberalism, referring to limiting the state’s role in the economy as well as reducing the state’s predatory functions. Also, democracy introduction reduced the state’s predatory functions as politicians had to pay attention to the opinions of the voters. As a result, the period between 1776 and 1929 was a liberal idea triumph which directed the intervention of the state in the economy has harmful effects. The liberal countries economic success confirms the major liberalism postulates. The start of the 20th the intervention of the state seemed bad and market was good, at the same time the period between 1815 and 1914 was the most peaceful time recorded in the history of human beings. The liberal democracy never allowed the total usage of the state’s potential in fostering economy (Baskin). Trade liberalization is one of the liberalization aspects that has promoted advancement among the elites or developed countries (Adler & Webster). However when focusing on the way it is working in the developing countries then it explains the reason for the strong opposition against it.The trade liberation is required to promote the income of a country through forcing the less productive resources to move to a more reproductive state. The economist refers this as the utilization of the comparative advantage. However, moving the low reproductive resources to the worse situation does not contribute to the development a country. One of the immediate effects of trade liberalization is jobs destruction. New jobs are to be created after this destruction. However, in most countries, these programs have worsened the state since there is lack of capital to transform these low reproductive the resources.The trade liberalization fact is that it can lead to unemployment. This is the main reason trade liberalization is opposed. The countries especially from East Asia took the globalization advantage in trade liberalization and started in a slow manner (Baskin). However, the western countries that emphasize of trade liberalization, they push it for those commodities that mainly they export and protect sectors that the developing countries many have petitioned and threatened their economy. This creates an opposition of many trade negations such as the Seattle that aimed at the development and advancement of the industries. However, neoliberal the alternative where modification is done.DebatesThe state is responsible for setting the minimum wages through the two mechanism means. The first, used from 2002 to 2003, the Employment Condition Commission (ECC) recommends the sectorial least wages that are gazetted by the labor ministry on basic employment condition acts. Currently, the labor ministry, as well as the ECC, set the minimum wages as eleven sectors including the wholesales as well as retails, forestry, private security, taxi, hospitality, and domestic workers. Civil engineering, farm work as well as hospitality. This method serves in setting minimum wages in many sectors where most workers are not organized into trade unions that are strong.Another mechanism used to set minimum wages entails the labor ministry extending collective contracts that are negotiated between the various unions and the employees in negotiating council establishment as in labor Relation Act. An example is that of the contracts in the metalworking as well as clothing industries.There are three approaches involved in national minimum salary. First, the liberal or free market view that is advocated by the Free Market Foundation. This approach suggests that wage regulations need to be opposed, partial because the salary rules inhibit job creations as well as economic growth. As a result, the labor market should be given its freedom in choosing their wages since the two mechanisms are all bad, and the national minimum salary is the worst as well. An opposite argument that Coleman suggest is that the national minimum salary should be compulsory and needs to be higher than an existing sectorial minimum salary. The range of R4800 to R 6000 in every mount. This range was achieved by using 40 percent to 50 percent of medium salary. Therefore, the major argument of Coleman is that more minimum salary may not only decrease low-paid workers exploitation and also it may generate job by consumption-fuelled development. The last approach is the middle view. In this view, the wages may be controlled in situations such as of that of South Africa through the level of meeting minimum salary need to consider the negative effects that are associated with employment. These wage rules may include sectorial minima as well as minimum wages (Adler & Webster). This minimum wages should not cause a large amount of job resulting higher salary reducing workers groups that might cause unemployment.Liberal capitalism failure provoked once more a discussion about the state’s role in development. The state should build capable, effective as well as an intelligent state. A capable effective and intelligent state works with the civil and private societies to agree and redefine upon its mandate, challenges as well as mission the entire country aspiration id I n socio-politico-economic terms the changes that are experienced in this aspects must be diagnosed, analyzed, agreed as well as discussed by participation as well as consultations of the population cross-sectional ways (Adler & Webster).The state should restore peace, security as well as the stability of the state. The state plays a vital role in ensuring the security, peace as well as the stability of a nation. Other private, as well as a civil society, may be involved in achieving these factors in the state. However, it is a challenge as well in the developing countries where their political establishment promotes the opposite of this expectation.The state should enforce constitutionalism as well as the law that rules the country and strengthen and modernize the system of the national judicially for fair affordable as well as accessible justice. Enforcement of the constitution, as well as the law, is the foundation of any development of a country. The power of the rule of laws can eliminate poverty the constitutional making procedure is important. At the same time, justice should be established in every resource and fair affordable as well as accessible justice (Adler & Webster).Finally, the state should sustain as well as strengthen accountability, trust as well as state institution legitimacy through ethics, transparency, leadership, accountability, integrity as well as professionalism. The state should encourage the ethics, transparency, leadership, accountability, integrity as well as professionalism in every aspect. Therefore, development of the state in the social, political and economic status will be evident.In conclusion, the state’s has a role to play in fostering development. Liberalism involves the limitation thus neoliberal being the solution. This is a better way of ensuring development, however, is faced with some opposition. Thus this shows the roles of the state in development such as strengthen accountability, trust as well as state institution legitimacy by ethics, transparency, leadership, accountability, integrity as well as professionalism, build capable, effective as well as an intelligent state are important.Work CitedBaskin. J. ‘Labour in South Africa’s transition to democracy: concertation in a third world setting’, in G Adler and E Webster (eds) Trade Unions and Democratization in South Africa, 1985-1997. New York: St Martin’s Pre J (2000)Adler, G and E Webster. ‘Towards a class compromise in South Africa’s “Double Transition”: bargained liberalization and the consolidation of democracy,’ Politics and Society 27(3) 1999.